In 2019, the State of Washington introduced a new law known as the Pollution Prevention for Healthy People and Puget Sound Act, and the program that implements this law is entitled Safer Products for Washington. The law established an administrative process to be followed by the Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the Department of Health regarding priority toxic chemicals in priority consumer products, and authorizes Ecology to regulate classes of chemicals in consumer products. Under this process, certain chemicals were defined as priority chemicals, including Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) chemicals, Polychlorinated biphenyls, Phthalates, organ halogen flame retardants and other flame retardants identified under the Children’s Safe Products Act, and Phenolic compounds. Ecology is also authorized to designate additional chemicals as priority chemicals every five years where they meet the qualifying criteria consistent with the schedule established in the 2019 law.

Under the schedule for Ecology’s regulatory activities to implement Safer Products for Washington, Ecology must:

  • Designate priority chemicals
  • Identify priority consumer products that include priority chemicals, taking into consideration specified criteria
  • Determine regulatory actions for the priority chemicals in priority consumer products. These regulatory actions may include a determination that no action is needed, may require manufacturers to provide notice of the use of a chemical, or may restrict or prohibit the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of a priority chemical in a consumer product
  • Adopt rules to implement regulatory determinations

In this context, the Washington State Department of Ecology issue the Senate Bill 5703 relating to the use of toxic chemicals in cosmetic products.



From the 1st January 2025, the manufacture, distribution, and sale of cosmetic products containing any of nine identified types of chemicals or chemical classes would be prohibited. Cosmetic products are defined in the same manner as cosmetics regulated by Interstate Commerce under the Drugs and Cosmetics code. Exceptions exist for prescription drugs approved by the FDA, and hydrofluoroolefins used as aerosol propellants, where both are excluded from regulated cosmetic product consideration in this context.

Cosmetic products may not contain the following eight categories of chemicals or chemical classes when intentionally added to the product:

  • Ortho-phthalates
  • Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances
  • Formaldehyde and chemicals determined by Ecology to release Formaldehyde
  • Methylene glycol
  • Mercury and Mercury compounds
  • Triclosan
  • m-Phenylenediamine and its salts
  • o-Phenylenediamine and its salts

Lead or lead compounds are also similarly restricted in cosmetic products at a level of 10 parts per million (0.001%), unless Ecology determines otherwise through rulemaking.

In-State retailers may exhaust their existing stock of restricted products through sales to the public until 1st January 2026.

Ecology may adopt rules to implement, administer, or enforce restrictions on chemicals in cosmetic products, and manufacturers found to be violating a requirement, rule, or order, are subject to civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation for a first offense, and $10,000 per violation for each repeat offense. Penalties and orders issued by Ecology can be appealed to the State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB). Penalties are deposited in the Model Toxics Control Operating Account.

The prohibiting of PFAS and other harmful chemicals is an important step towards safer cosmetics, and many of these chemicals are already banned in cosmetics in other States. The departments of Ecology and Health would be required to test products for toxic content, carry out community outreach, and, if appropriate, consider additional regulations under the Safer Products for Washington program.



By prohibiting the sale of products containing ‘undisclosed synthetic fragrance’, the original version of the bill would force companies to disclose their trade secrets, resulting in decreased competitiveness, the risk of counterfeits, and little in terms of increased safety for consumers.

Historically, fragrance formulations have been afforded trade secret protection at Federal and State level. The ability to preserve confidential business information (CBI) is essential to the fragrance industry, protecting the intellectual property of the fragrance creators/manufacturers, and allowing for competition in the marketplace. Creating a fragrance that meets olfactive requirements, is technically sound, and safe for its intended use, is a highly trained skill that is applied through substantial knowledge/experience. Without CBI protection, businesses and consumers face threat of inappropriate counterfeit fragrances, and a result, potentially dangerous products flooding the market.

Additionally, when assessing the safety of fragrance ingredients, the fragrance industry does not distinguish between natural and synthetic, and thoroughly assesses both types with the same sense of care and attention. Scientists can create ‘nature identical’ ingredients that mimic the scent of their natural counterparts, as well as that of their chemical structure. In terms of toxicity, we must refer to the structure of a molecule and its concentration, not its origin. Please refer to our Newsletter N°11 entitled « NATURAL VS SYNTHETIC INGREDIENTS : An approach that is too binary? ».

The Fragrance Creators Association (FCA) submitted a letter of opposition to the original version of this bill due to its essential ban of undisclosed fragrance ingredients, and its lack of alignment with the requirements of other States. The FCA worked with their allied trades as they negotiated with the sponsor of the bill to achieve these changes. 

Through the amended bill in early February 2022, which has been referred to as the Ways and Means Committee, in an effort to address business concerns, ‘undisclosed synthetic fragrances’ have been successfully removed from the prohibited list, and the disclosure requirements have also been withdrawn.



The FCA will continue to monitor this bill as it moves through the legislative process to ensure that it retains these amendments. 

It is very important that every State encourages the legislature to consider the results of collaborative efforts in the same way that California did so in 2020, when it passed AB 2762 to ban certain cosmetic ingredients. This bill was the result of months of in-depth, multi-stakeholder discussions between California lawmakers, NGO representatives, trade associations, and personal care product manufacturers.  This process also took into account existing international regulations.

It is relevant to note that a patchwork of state laws and deviation from international regulations creates confusion not only among industry, but also among consumers.

In order to anticipate any new restriction and regulation on toxic substances, Sozio has created its Clean Fragrance initiative with fragrances that have been formulated without any substance of concern for human health. Sozio has also committed to do better for the environment by developing fragrances made with 100% biodegradable ingredients.



If you are interested by our Clean initiative, fragrances made with 100% of biodegradable ingredients, or need any further information about this bill, please reach out to us via email: or through your designated Sales Representative.




Ecovadis gold rating

Thanks to its daily commitment and its efforts in terms of Social Responsibility, Sozio has been awarded with the gold medal of the Ecovadis certification and joins the top 5% of rated companies.

This certification rewards the CSR standard implemented by Sozio several years ago. Concerned about its social and environmental impact, Sozio has developed a CLEAN FRAGRANCE label in order to create safer scents for humans and for the environment with a commitment towards transparency in its formulation. With the launch of its natural raw material division, BOTANICALS, Sozio pledges for a better and more responsible sourcing, ensuring traceability and premium quality.

Being more sustainable and guaranteeing the ethical sourcing of its natural raw materials are some of the main goals Sozio has set in its CSR strategy.


In October 2021, the European Commission adopted a revised set of EU Ecolabel criteria for Cosmetic products, and an all-new criteria for Pet Care products. 



Many environmental claims are difficult to understand or are confusing for the consumer. Green self-claims have increased in the cosmetics business, and many have no scientific evidence to back them up. To address this concerning trend, the EU extended the Ecolabel scheme to all cosmetics in October 2021, using a more robust set of criteria thoroughly checked by NGOs.

The EU Ecolabel is a reliable, third party verified, label of environmental excellence, which takes into consideration the environmental impact of a product throughout its entire life-cycle. This begins at the phase of individual raw material (ingredient) extraction and continues throughout the service life of the consumer product including that of its final disposal.

While the current requirements only apply to rinse-off cosmetics like body wash or shampoo, the revised EU Ecolabel criteria for cosmetics is designed to cover a far wider scope. The updated rules will cover ALL cosmetic products as defined under the Cosmetic Product Regulation, including leave-on applications such as body lotion, hand cream, make-up, deodorant, and sunscreen. Additionally, manufacturers of pet care products now have the opportunity to apply for the label through a separate product group which has been set up for this purpose.


Want to learn more about the revised criteria? 

The EU Ecolabel is awarded to sustainably designed products, encouraging innovation, and contributing to the EU goal of climate neutrality by 2050 and to a clean and circular economy with a zero-pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment.

Ambitious criteria, focusing on the main environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of the products, ensure that EU Ecolabel cosmetics and pet care products are of good quality and are up there with the best on the market in terms of environmental performance.

The criteria for cosmetics include but are not limited to: 

  • Ban/prohibition of substances that are carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic to reproduction (CMR’s), substances of very high concern (SVHC’s), nanomaterials, substances identified or suspected of having endocrine disrupting properties, microplastics, phthalates and perfluorinated or polyfluorinated substances.
  • Stringent restrictions on substances that are hazardous to the environment, or are skin sensitizing, as well as restrictions on fragrances, preservatives, colorants, and UV filters.
  • No fragrance in children’s products, or for products marketed as “mild/sensitive”.
  • Only permits the use of sustainably sourced palm oil, palm kernel oil and their derivatives
  • Only permits the use of biodegradable surfactants

For the full list of requirements, please refer to the official EU Ecolabel criteria for cosmetics and pet-care products.


New EU Ecolabel to overcome cosmetics greenwashing? 

According to the latest research of the European Commission, 42% of green claims are potentially false or deceptive in sectors such as cosmetics, textiles, and household equipment. Additionally, more than half of the green trademarks analyses provide insufficient information or offer no actual evidence to support their green claim.

EU figures show that although most consumers are receptive to green claims when making their purchase decisions, most of them find it difficult to understand which products are truly environmentally friendly. Furthermore, a large number of European consumers say they do not trust this type of information.

Third-party verified schemes seem to be the only way forward to tackle this wave of cosmetics greenwashing.


Relations between EU Ecolabel and Nordic Swan. Is a future coordination possible? 

In addition to the EU Ecolabel, a number of other labelling, certification and information management systems are widespread in the Nordic European countries, like the Nordic Swan label. The Swan maintains a strong market position where it is well known and respected in all Nordic countries, and although awareness and knowledge of EU Ecolabel is increasing, it lags behind that of the Swan. In addition, the Swan has produced a larger number of criteria and issued significantly more licenses.

Despite the larger potential market and the lower price of the EU Ecolabel, there is a greater demand for the Swan in the Nordic market. Both systems operate side by side and make use of common resources, and it is likely that the Swan and the EU Ecolabel will be able to co-exist for the time being without radical changes. Increased coordination of the schemes has been supported by efforts to harmonize criteria documents in a case-by-case approach, and there are also joint marketing efforts between the systems, particularly in the case of Denmark. In the other Nordic countries, the EU Ecolabel is less visible through public information and marketing of the ecolabelling bodies. Interviews with companies indicate that there is a demand for both labels, and there are two ways of reasoning among producers – some appreciate and use the Swan on Nordic markets due to its market recognition and strong reputation, whereas others wish to have a label that is valid for larger markets. In a third category, there are producers who choose to use the EU Ecolabel in combination with the Swan, or as a stand-alone label for use solely in the Nordic countries. 

The valid questions are, what is the purpose of harmonization and for whom? Should harmonization take place focusing on product groups (harmonizing the product group definitions), criteria (use of existing criteria or creation of core/baseline criteria)? The consequences and results of the different possibilities for harmonization need further exploration.


Sozio’s commitment and ability to offer fragrances compliant with the EU Ecolabel 

At Sozio, we promote the use of renewable raw materials that are sustainably sourced or derived from green chemistry. We are also working on solutions that support the development of the circular economy by offering a large choice of fragrances compliant with current labels like EU Ecolabel, GreenSeal, Safer Choice, and through our pioneering efforts in the development of our own CLEAN fragrance label and our innovative Biodegradability tool.


Follow up

If you need any further information about the EU Ecolabel, please reach out to us via email: or through your designated Sales Representative.